A Soul for a Bowl of Pottage

There is a story in the Bible about how Jacob stole Essau’s birth right for a bowl of pottage.

Well, I keep getting asked what I intend to do for people if elected.  It is a question about how cheap the souls of the voters are.

 

The founders designed a society where we would have economic stability, wealth, and political freedom.

Simply said there are four principals to get there and I promise to gage my decisions based upon them.

Non-Intervention, ie do not start wars finish them.  Wars dislocate the economy and are, at best risky business.

 

Currency Stability- all governments finance themselves three ways taxes, borrowing and theft.  Currency not supported by taxes and borrowing is supported by theft.  This is why you are paying double the price for gas you paid in 2001 even though the cost has gone down 35%.  Simply put government currency manipulation stole your buying power.  I promise to do all I can to stabilize the currency.

 

Free Trade.  Not government blessed trade.  No one fights with their business partners, so trade is the path to peace, and the founders knew it.  At home this means the least regulation on business as possible.  I was up in the country last week and heard the Missouri Hospital Association argue that we needed to rob (tax) to cover their charitable costs.  But at the same time, we shouldn’t open up competition in the medical field to drop those costs.  Free Trade means we all face the rough and tumble of the market.

 

Finally limit the power of the government.

 

Simple ideas.  I thought that changes to a society where you can plan and prosper was plenty of reason to vote for my programs.  It is not for some.  

 

If you think you are getting something from a politician except protection of your right to try and better yourself then you are sadly deluded.  If you think that you will vote for the politician with the biggest promises than you forget that he who has the gold makes the rules.  Personal greed is no way to hire a public servant.  

 

When you expect to get trinkets from your politicians in return for your freedom and prosperity, you deserve the slavery you suffer.

 

DAVEBROWNING

Published in:  on October 26, 2008 at 12:02 pm Leave a Comment

Did I hear the Revolution Begin?

Berg v. Obama

Well one and all, I am afraid I just heard the dime drop on a revolution.

 

The most fundamental right produced by our revolution was the right not to be ruled by foreigners.

 

Now a federal judge in Pennsylvania says we do not have that right?  

 

Frankly I want to give Obama the benefit of the doubt.  I suspect that he was born in Kenya and does not know it because Obama’s Mama was such a flake.  I believe she lied to everyone.  

 

We had a situation like that in Jackson County with a friend, George Owens.  George was running for Sheriff and his opponents claimed he was running under an alias.  Turned out he was.  His parents had died when he was just a toddler, and the Owens’ took him in raised him as an Owens, put him in the family bible, in the wills, the whole bit.  On top of that even though he had never been formally adopted the Owens boys and girls all called him their brother and meant it.  George never new he was not an Owens.

 

I am hoping Obama’s situation turns out to be something like that.

 

All the same the birth certificate on his web site is a clear forgery, not complying with the law of Hawaii at the time.

 

This stuff is chilling to say the least.

 

I do not like Obama.  I think he is a skilled liar.  I have no intention of voting for either Obama or Insane McCain.

 

That said, I do not want him becoming president with a cloud like this hanging over him.  I want the matter cleared up.  I want to be able to hate him without believing that he is a foreign puppet.  If he is a puppet, if he is a foreigner then the powers  that be have shredded our constitution.

 

That is a matter that must be expatiated in blood and I am too stove in for that game.

 

DaveBrowning

Published in:  on at 11:23 am Leave a Comment

Blind Pig Graves

There is a country saying; “Even a Blind Pig finds a acorn every once in a while”.

 

For most of his career Sam Graves has been that “Blind PIG” supporting every mistake of the administration from NAIS to the occupation of Iraq.  To a supporter of constitutionally limited government, it has been a dismal record.  His record would not predict it but somehow Blind Pig Graves found the acorn of truth and voted against the bailout.

 

This time Blind Pig Graves got it so right that he deserves to be quoted:

 

October 3, 2008

Graves Statement on Bailout Vote

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Congressman Sam Graves issued the following statement on today’s vote: 

“I voted against the bailout bill on Monday because it gave $700 billion to those on Wall Street who created this mess while doing nothing to protect taxpayers or the small businesses affected by the economic crisis. I voted on principle, and those principles have not changed. The only difference between today’s bill and the last bailout bill is an extra $100 billion in spending and giveaways to special interests. 

“There is no question that we must act to protect the lifesavings of our retirees, the college savings accounts of our children, and the access to credit that our small businesses depend on to make payroll.  Unfortunately, bailing out Wall Street will not do anything to help Main Street and will only encourage the behavior that put our economy in the position it is in now.

“From the beginning, the Administration and House Leadership have failed to consider other options that would protect the taxpayers and protect Main Street.  Their approach to our current crisis is only setting us up for another crisis down the road. With jobs, businesses and our entire economy at stake, Congress and the President have rushed into a bad decision that fails to address the real problems that caused this crisis.

“I hope and pray that this bill works, but I fear, that by failing to address the real problems, Congress has only passed on $800 billion of debt to our children and grandchildren.”

 

September 29, 2008

Graves Statement on Bailout Vote

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Congressman Sam Graves issued the following statement on today’s vote:  

 “The actions of a few on Wall Street and at Freddie and Fannie have imperiled our entire Financial Market both at home and internationally.  Ignoring fundamental accounting principles, sound  risk-management practices, and responsible moral leadership, these individuals have brought our nation to the brink of financial disaster. 

 “Congress’ attempt today to ‘right these wrongs’ with an unprecedented $700 billion bailout neither properly punished the wrongdoers nor adequately protected the innocent taxpayers, investors, and retirees.

  “Rather, this failed bailout effort was nothing more than a blank check with no real safeguard for taxpayers, investors and retirees, and I fear it would have had the unintended consequence of rewarding the criminal and morally reprehensible behavior that created this disaster with little or no guarantee for millions of Americans that have already suffered from their irresponsibility.” 

I oppose Sam Graves in this election.  I think I would do a much better job than he has done.  But, when a man stands up for principle and lays out the problems as honestly as he has done, he deserves our commendation.

 

Thank you Sam, I would be hard pressed to lay out the situation any better myself.  DAVEBROWNING

Published in:  on October 5, 2008 at 3:34 pm Leave a Comment
Tags: , , ,

Fighting Poverty with Crocodile Tears

This post is animated by the letter received from two separate individuals which appears at the end of this post:

I think both of the individuals who sent this letter ( it is a form letter provided by NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby) are well meaning and clueless.

We have been in a war on poverty for the last 40+ years.  So far, poverty is winning.  Those who think we can end poverty simply disbelieve the Lord when he said the poor will always be with you.  The war on poverty has been a failure for good reason.

There are only two known tools that combat poverty.  They are education and opportunity.  How strange that the government programs emphasize neither.  The two are related in that those who see opportunity are usually willing to sacrifice themselves to get the education to grasp those opportunities.  I want higher education to be seen as a right, and am having difficulty to square that with government lending schemes.  The greatest tragedy in america is that students graduate from institutions of higher learning in crushing debt – slaves of the economic system.  I prefer my education inexpensive and politically incorrect.  I will listen to plans to create such an environment, but to date I have nothing more than a vague idea.

The other key to ending poverty is opportunity.  We must create an opportunity state.  Government regulation is not for the purpose of consumer safety.  Government regulation has as its purpose to create barriers to competition to favor the already successful.

It is amazing how little money most folks need to meet their dreams:  a nice paid for home, new vehicles, decent furnishings, and money to send the kids to college.  For most folks we are talking well below five hundred thousand dollars.  Most folks see that as an impossible goal.  That is because the government regulates business to keep down competition and thus their opportunity to get ahead, and then steals the savings of the successful by currency manipulation.  

Like the parable of the talents in the bible, money must be put to work.  Investing in the government is bad stewardship, secure and safe like hiding the money in the ground.  It does not go to work making more money.  Money invested in business does that.

We need to review the hundreds of feet that constitute the code of federal regulation and get the government out of the regulation business creating a business environment filled with vast new opportunities.  We need to end corporate welfare and encourage small business.

Finally we need to return the control of wealth to the american people by preventing currency manipulation.  No one who can not plan and save for the future can expect to have a future.  Under our present system if the government miscalculates the buying power of your dollar falls.  Currency manipulation can only be stopped by a currency redeemable in precious metals whose value is set by the free market.

These steps will create a society where people, can plan, save, innovate and take risks.  In that society there is opportunity.  In that society education is a tool to advance.

The changes I propose are not easy.  I do not cry crocodile tears, and beg for government bailouts.  I want a society where free men and women can see that hard work and virtue will be rewarded.  

A society based on government programs and equalizing taxation only brings more poverty, less freedom, more taxes, and social slavery.  How those who would enslave us cry their tears, but they are montebanks, liars, and enemies of free men and women, and just like their crocodile tears, their fake concern masks viscous predators waiting to eat your children.

DAVEBROWNING

 

 

==============================================================

Dear Mr. Browning:

 

During the remaining weeks of your campaign, I urge you to publicly 

address the issue of poverty in our nation and the steps you propose to 

take to cut poverty significantly in the next five to ten years.  

 

The urgency of the need to reduce poverty escalates with the increase in 

unemployment rates and due to the devastation of multiple hurricanes. 

 

As you campaign for election in November, I will be watching ads and 

listening to what you say about reducing poverty.  I believe that as a 

nation we have the potential reduce poverty significantly. I’d like to 

know what plans you have to reduce poverty, and I ask  you to share your 

ideas with your constituents in the weeks ahead.

 

The Preamble to the United States Constitution raises the “general 

welfare” as one of the responsibilities of the federal government.  The 

general welfare is suffering, as attested to by the Census Bureau poverty 

report for 2007, released the last week of August.  Although the number of 

families living below the poverty threshold held from 2006 to 2007, those 

below fifty-percent of the poverty level fell deeper into poverty; and 

more households joined that group.  The only income group with any gain in 

income was the top 10 percent.  

 

The number of persons without health insurance in 2007 was significantly 

higher than the number in 2006.   The good news is a decrease in the 

number of children without health insurance, due to Medicaid and the SCHIP 

program.  However over three million children remain without regular 

access to regular health care.  It is frightening to think of the loss of 

potential among children who lack consistent health monitoring, many of 

whom are also under-nourished.   Health and nutrition are integrally 

related to a child’s ability to grow and develop to meet their potential.  

It is critical that future generations are capable of solving national and 

global problems as they continue to escalate.

 

I urge you to speak out, let all of us, your constituents know what you 

plan to do about poverty when you are elected.

Published in:  on September 21, 2008 at 3:43 am Leave a Comment

Montebanks

 

I just spent one of the most unbelievable afternoons of my life at  the September 20 Candidate Forum in Kansas City put on by efect.org.  There, I heard Missouri Democratic State Representatives Beth Low and Paul LeVota advocate the adoption of the failed French Socialist Medical Policies of Jaques Mitterand as their program for Missouri.  I would have gone after them right there but it is impolite to call some one a montebank without the hosts prior permission. 

 

These two Democrats have lived through the failure of European Socialism, and learned, it would appear, exactly nothing.  The state has a small monetary surplus, and so they wish to expand programs that will take long term financing.  Mr. LeVota went so far as to say that they would just  ” find  the money “ – meaning tax the people of Missouri Blind.  It was maddening.

 

Want to make real change?  Learn what your elected officials really believe.

Published in:  on at 2:44 am Comments (1)
Tags: , ,

Education is Our Greatest Weapon

Education is Our Greatest Weapon

Pillars of Liberty

Declaration of Independence

US Constitution

Federalist Papers

Anti-Federalist Papers

Thomas Paine’s Common Sense

The Jefferson Letters

Patrick Henry – Give Me Liberty Speech

John Locke – Second Treatise of Civil Government

Adam Smith – The Wealth of Nations

For those that find Wealth of Nations to be a bit thick and difficult, I strongly recommend P.J. O’Rourke’s wonderful primer, On The Wealth of Nations – Books That Changed the World.

As long as I am pitching P.J., there are two books that set me on the road to understanding, O’Rourke’s All the Trouble in the World – The Lighter Side of Overpopulation, Famine, Ecological Disaster, Ethnic Hatred, Plague, and Poverty and Milton and Rose Friedman’s Free to Choose. Free to Choose was also made into a TV series, the videos are here.

Published in:  on September 15, 2008 at 9:35 am Leave a Comment
Tags: ,

What Can Congress Do About Gas Prices?

The KSHB Chronicles

 

On 7 September 2008, I am to speak to KSHB TV in Kansas City about several issues. 

They tell me that they want to know my energy policy, whether I believe in Global Warming, What can be done about Gasoline Prices, When I think American Troops should come home from Iraq, Where the Next Front should be in the War on Terror, Who is responsible for the mortgage crisis, and What I would do to increase jobs.

 

WHAT CAN CONGRESS DO ABOUT GAS PRICES?

 

The first thing to get straight about gas prices is that there is no lack of supply of petroleum in the market.  This means that the recent rise in prices is not a matter of supply and demand.   

FACT. On 28 August 2008 the price of a gallon of gas was $3.49 and the price of an ounce of gold $812.50.  So the price of a gallon of gasoline was 0.00429538 ounces of gold.  

FACT.  On 1 September 2001 the average price of a gallon of gas was $1.123 and an ounce of gold was $270.00.  That made the price of a gallon of gas 0.00417407 ounces of gold.  

FACT. This means that gas is selling at $1.16 in 2001 dollars  or $0.037 higher than at the same time in 2001.

So, if there is no fuel shortage, and the price of gasoline is fundamentally the same as it was 7 years ago, what gives.  

Well, simply put, the government reduced the buying power of the dollar.  Simple math makes that clear.  It now takes $3.49 to purchase what $1.16 bought in 2001.  No reduction in supply accounts for it.  No increase in demand accounts for it.

So, what can be done?  Nothing as long as the currency value can be repegged by the government arbitrarily.  When dollars were redeemable in silver the government could not play these kind of games.  This is the same game that the states played under the Articles of Confederation.  This is the very reason the constitution requires that currency be redeemable in gold or silver.  The founding fathers did not want the government to have the power to affect their wealth in this manner.

The constitution has not been changed, the government, in both Republican and Democrat administrations, has been acting illegally.  The dollar needs to be redeemable in silver once again.  Were that so, then, no matter what paper currency games the government, and its lap dog the Federal Reserve, try to play, the average consumer will be protected.  Historically, the result of currency redeemable in precious metal is price stability.

 Governments support themselves by taxation, borrowing, and the theft of their citizens buying power (savings).  The government stole your buying power, and spent it on some program you did not want.  Now your dollar buys less.  It just goes to show that Saint Augustine was right when he said the difference between governments and thieves is that thieves are honest about what they do.

Published in:  on August 30, 2008 at 8:07 pm Comments (1)
Tags: , , , , ,

When Should Our Troops Come Home From Iraq?

The KSHB Chronicles

On 7 September 2008, I am to speak to KSHB TV in Kansas City about several issues. 

They tell me that they want to know my energy policy, whether I believe in Global Warming, What can be done about Gasoline Prices, When I think American Troops should come home from Iraq, Where the Next Front should be in the War on Terror, Who is responsible for the mortgage crisis, and What I would do to increase jobs.

 

When Should Our Troops Come Home From Iraq?

We need to look at some history before answering this question.

Fact:  We invaded Iraq because Saddam Hussien lied and convinced the world that he was the dangerous possessor of weapons of mass destruction.  Being the kind of guy who was known to stuff people into wood chippers and gas babies, he managed to create what he wanted.  He wanted the world terrified of him.  He did not anticipate that the result would lead to the destruction of his armies and hanging at the end of a gibbet.

Fact.  We crushed the Iraqi established state, and created a situation of social chaos.

Fact.  We were not prepared to re-establish a democratic authority.

Fact.  George Bush was right to say mission accomplished.  From that point on, we have been flying by the seat of our pants.

Fact.  Assigning Swat Team and Policing duties to our regular combat troops is putting them at risk because it is beyond their regular duties and training.  They are doing a great job of learning on the fly, but it is an abuse of their purpose to use them in this way.

Fact.  Our failure to have a plan created a chaotic mess for the average Iraqi on the street.

Fact.  It is no surprise that our government is clueless as to how to manage Iraq.  They are clueless as to how to manage the United States.

Fact.  In all this chaos the Iraqi people have demonstrated a talent for blue finger democracy.

Fact.  We believe in Democracy.  The Iraqi’s believe in democracy.  

Fact.  Our military leaders have said that we will need to occupy Iraq for fifty years.

I suggest we submit the question to a vote by the Iraqi people.  If they think we are a valuable contribution to their social stability.  We stay.  If they think they would be better served with us gone, we go, as quickly as possible.  No political spin from their leaders. No political spin from our leaders.  After all, it is their country, and it should be run on their say so.

Published in:  on at 7:29 pm Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , ,

Washington The Next Front on Terror!

The KSHB Chronicles

On 7 September 2008, I am to speak to KSHB TV in Kansas City about several issues. 

They tell me that they want to know my energy policy, whether I believe in Global Warming, What can be done about Gasoline Prices, When I think American Troops should come home from Iraq, Where the Next Front should be in the War on Terror, Who is responsible for the mortgage crisis, and What I would do to increase jobs.

 

WASHINGTON; THE NEXT FRONT IN THE WAR ON TERROR

 

It is time to inject some truth and plain speaking into this “War on Terror” business.  Wars are fought between nation states, or at least between princes (big thugs).  Al Quaeda is not a country, a warlord, a prince/thug or anything else that does not fit the bill of gangster and pirate.  We are not engaged in a “War on Terror”.

Saddam Hussein and the Iraq war were not a part of any “War on Terror”.  Saddam convinced everyone he had wepons of mass destruction.  Being the kind of a guy who shoved folks into wood chippers for fun, and murdered babies for practice, the world became understandably nervous at the idea of Saddam with such weapons.   Saddam ran his bluff as long as he could and got hung for it.

The fighting in Afganistan against the Taliban was a reprisal against harborers of the Al Quaeda gang.  The Taliban was a deplorable bunch but they posed no threat to the industrial world outside providing the gangsters a safe haven.  The Taliban is gone.  I talked to a former seal last night who served there and he said we were only there to make the politicians happy.

Now we are engaged in a fight with a well armed, well trained gang.  It is no different than dealing with the Mafia, or the Colombian Drug Cartel.   Well armed and well trained gangs one and all.  I read this morning that the Colombian Drug Cartel purchased US military helicopters from Israel.  They are closer to us, and better armed than Al Quaeda.  They prey upon our cities and have caused more violence in our cities than Al Quaeda has ever done.

Drive by shootings, drug related street crime, murders, bombings can all be laid to their door step.

Even so, there is no hysteria to have national identity papers, internal check points, bank reporting of our business, snoop searches, uncharged imprisonment off shore, an end to habeas corpus or other impositions on our civil rights because of the Colombian Drug Cartels.  But take a bunch of half educated Muslims, give then some IED’s, some pipe bombs, some RPG’s  and a few hundred AK47’s and Washington goes crazy and wants FISA Courts.  

We do not have 150,000 men chasing the drug cartel out of Colombia, and never did.

So, I think the next front in the “War on Terror” should be the front to bring some perspective to this so called “War on Terror”, and to review and roll back every authoritarian portion  of the patriot act that has supported government secrecy,  including warrantless searches and secret courts.

What Energy Policy?

The KSHB Chronicles

On 7 September 2008, I am to speak to KSHB TV in Kansas City about several issues. 

They tell me that they want to know my energy policy, whether I believe in Global Warming, What can be done about Gasoline Prices, When I think American Troops should come home from Iraq, Where the Next Front should be in the War on Terror, Who is responsible for the mortgage crisis, and What I would do to increase jobs.

 

WHAT ENERGY POLICY?

 

We need to decide whether our goal is energy independence, or being a member of a globalist energy system.  Not wanting our internal policies subject to the whims and dictates of world energy czars, I prefer energy independence.

Today the United States has no real energy policy.  Unless, that is, one counts maintaining a strategic oil reserve.  Everything else we talk about in the field of energy policy is tainted by globalist preservationism.  The latest is carbon footprint taxation.  This is nothing less than trying to backdoor the Kyoto accords into national policy.

I believe that we need to get our heads out of the nineteenth century and look forward.  I believe that we should move the nation to cellulostic e95 ethanol for transportation, and that we should recognize that sugar based ethanol is only a way station on that path.

I believe that the answer to a fuel price crisis created by government manipulation of the value of the currency can not be solved by offshore or Anwar drilling.  Those issues may need to be addressed, but not without developing a real energy goal and policy.  

I believe that we must recognize the harm the global preservationist movement has caused, and allow the creation of more localized petroleum refining and ethanol distilling.  Today the global preservationist movement has driven 90% of our refining capacity to a handful of counties in South Texas.  This is a situation which makes the nation vunerable to weather disasters and man made crisis.  We need a more diverse motor fuel supply system.

I believe that we need to make the licensing of small nuclear power facilities easier.  We have a nuclear navy.  We train nuclear technicians to run that navy without incident.  That tried and tested technology could be used to power many of our smaller cities, relieving the strains on our power grid.

As alternative energy technologies become viable they should also be incorporated into our power grid.  No one talks about the most viable of the alternative technologies – Tesla Geo Thermal Electrical Generation.  I wonder if that is because Tesla Geo Thermal Electrical Generation frees consumers from the power grid? 

Up until now we have been trying to legislatively choose between competing technologies.  Perhaps the reality is that corporate welfare is rife in the energy field, and partisans of one or another of the possible technologies are just trying to protect pocketbooks.  In any case, it is not within the governments ability to legislate  science and technological progress. The government has no business favoring one technology over another until the purpose and goals of an agreed upon national energy policy are adopted.